Legal Opinion

Nimkoff Rosenfeld & Schechter, LLP v. O'Flaherty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 18, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard F. Braun, J.), entered July 23, 2009, which denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs failure to plead at the outset that the dispute over counsel fees and disbursements was not covered by the Fee Dispute Resolution Program (see 22 NYCRR 137.6 [b] [2]) is not a jurisdictional defect precluding it from serving an amended complaint (see Kerner & Kerner v Dunham, 46 AD3d 372 [2007]). Therefore, plaintiff had the right to amend its complaint during the pendency of defendants’ motion to dismiss…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chalasani v. NeumanNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Elegante Leasing, Ltd. v. Cross Trans Svc, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Johnson v. SpenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Kerner v. DunhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roam Capital, Inc. v. Asia Alternatives Mgt. LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. Roam Capital, Inc. v. Asia Alternatives Mgt. LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API