Legal Opinion

State v. Roth

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 23, 2007No. AC 27517PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVINE, J.

The defendant, Peg E. Roth, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2005) § 14-227a (a) (1), operating a motor vehicle while her license was suspended in violation of General Statutes § 14-215 (a) and interfering with an officer in violation of General Statutes § 53a-167a (a). The defendant’s primary claim on appeal is that there was insufficient evidence by which the jury reasonably could have found that she operated a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. State v. CalabreseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. State v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  5. State v. HaightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. State v. BharratConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. Kim v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API