Prusecki v. Branch Motor Express
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
SCALERA, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).
The employer appeals from a judgment entered in the Division of Workers’ Compensation that determined the petitioner to be 25% partially permanently disabled, 20% as a result of a myocardial infarction, and 5% for traumatic anxiety and cardiophobia. We address here the recent statutory amendment relating to coronary and cardiovascular injuries and more particularly the so-called “wear and tear” requirement contained in the statute.
The evidence produced at the hearing established that petitioner was 53 years old…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Close v. Kordulak Bros.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Perez v. Pantasote, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Ciuba v. Irvington Varnish & Insulator Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Dwyer v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hellwig v. JF Rast & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Hellwig v. JF Rast & Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987