Legal Opinion

Prusecki v. Branch Motor Express

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 3, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

SCALERA, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

The employer appeals from a judgment entered in the Division of Workers’ Compensation that determined the petitioner to be 25% partially permanently disabled, 20% as a result of a myocardial infarction, and 5% for traumatic anxiety and cardiophobia. We address here the recent statutory amendment relating to coronary and cardiovascular injuries and more particularly the so-called “wear and tear” requirement contained in the statute.

The evidence produced at the hearing established that petitioner was 53 years old…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. Close v. Kordulak Bros.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. Perez v. Pantasote, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Ciuba v. Irvington Varnish & Insulator Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  5. Dwyer v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hellwig v. JF Rast & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. Hellwig v. JF Rast & Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API