Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Davenport Elevator Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Brookings county. Hon. J. O. Andrews, Judge. Action by Theodore Meyer and another against the Davenport Elevator Company to recover the value of certain wheat. Prom a judgment for plaintiffs and an order overruling a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPuller, J.

This appeal is from a judgment and an order everruling a motion for a new trial entered in an action for the value of some wheat covered, it is claimed, by a chattel mortgage and converted by the defendant. The facts and circumstances, either admitted, or appearing from competent testimony properly submitted to the jury, and sufficient to sustain a verdict, by which they stand proved, are these: On the 7th day of March, 1895, to secure his promissory note of even date, George Schnellar executed to respondents a chattel mortgage, which was duly filed, covering all crops to be grown and har*174veste…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morgan's Assignees v. ShinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. McAnnulty v. SeickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  3. Fuller v. ParrishMichigan Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Lamson v. MoffatWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Dobbs v. KelloggWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rochford v. BarrettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Commercial Service Corp. v. L. Paulle-Midway Fixture & Show Case Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Olson v. DaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Magnusson v. LinwellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API