Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Mildeberger

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided June 15, 1829PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Assumpsit for goods sold and delivered. The defendants pleaded, 1. The general issue. 2. Payment. 3. That the goods mentioned in the declaration were sold by the plaintiff on an agreement to accept in payment therefor, to the extent of six hundred and thirty-eight dollars, a promissory note for that sum, drawn by S. Penny & Sons, in favour of the defendant, bearing date the 8th day of April, 1828, payable four months after date, endorsed by the defendant without recourse,…

Read the full summary

Assumpsit for goods sold and delivered. The defendants pleaded, 1. The general issue. 2. Payment. 3. That the goods mentioned in the declaration were sold by the plaintiff on an agreement to accept in payment therefor, to the extent of six hundred and thirty-eight dollars, a promissory note for that sum, drawn by S. Penny & Sons, in favour of the defendant, bearing date the 8th day of April, 1828, payable four months after date, endorsed by the defendant without recourse, and the balance in cash. That the defendants had, according to their agreement, tendered the note and the cash, which the…

1Opinion of the Court

Hoffman J.

According to my understanding of the charge, the Judge did not submit to the jury any thing relating to the legal effect of the contract. He merely charged them, that if there was a mutual mistake between the parties, as to the terms, upon which the note of Penny & Sons was to be received, then that the agreement was not binding as to the note, and that the' plaintiff might recover upon the original cause of action. Taking the whole charge together, and it is evident that nothing but facts were put to the jury, and their finding appears to be consistent with the evidence.

A contract…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hearne v. Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Insurance Co. v. Young's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Utley v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  5. Cutts v. . GuildNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API