Legal Opinion

Waters v. Pfister & Vogel Leather Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1922PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: Lawrence W. Halsey, Circuit Judge. The defendant accepted delivery of goods transported from New York to Milwaukee, after passage of the Interstate Commerce Act, without paying in full the published tariff for such transportation.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: Lawrence W. Halsey, Circuit Judge. The defendant accepted delivery of goods transported from New York to Milwaukee, after passage of the Interstate Commerce Act, without paying in full the published tariff for such transportation. It appears that a bill of lading was issued by the Russian East Asiatic Steamship Com-party, Limited, at Riga, and immediately indorsed to defendant, and provided that the goods are “Shipped . . . by Ed. R. Lange in and upon the steamship called the Estonia ... to be delivered from the ship’s deck,…

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

The case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts. There is some dispute as to whether or not the bills of lading issued were through bills. Ed. R. Lange was the agent of the shippers, and the stipulation recites :

“Said Russian East Asiatic Steamship Company, Limited, issued and delivered to said Edward R. Lange two bills of lading for such shipment from Riga, Russia, to Milwaukee, Wisconsin, which were then and there assigned to the defendant, Pfister & Vogel Leather Company.”

It does not appear definitely whether, upon the goods reaching New York and being delivered by the steamship…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. J. I. Case Plow WorksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  5. J. H. Hamlen & Sons Co. v. Illinois Cent. R.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Western & Atlantic R. v. UnderwoodDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1922
  3. American Railway Express Co. v. Mohawk Dairy Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Houston & T. C. R. v. JohnsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  5. Farrar v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API