Legal Opinion
Farrar v. Perkins
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided December 11, 1926No. 26,930PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, J.:
This action, which was here before on a question of the • sufficiency of the petition (116 Kan. 374, 226 Pac. 714), was brought by plaintiff, W. F. Farrar, formerly station agent at Oswego for the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company, against defendant, Fred Perkins, to recover a balance due as freight charges on nine carloads of lambs (2,600 head) which were shipped by one Pitman from California to Oswego, and received and taken from the custody of the railway company, and this plaintiff, as its agent, on November 10, 1920, by this…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- New York Central Railroad v. Warren Ross Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Pennsylvania R.R. Co. v. . TitusNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Union Pac. R. v. American Smelting & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kansas Electric Power Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Thompson v. RichardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
- Farrar v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Sun-Ripe Products, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1947
- Strong v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.