Legal Opinion

Scott v. Gilmore

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1920No. 9435PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Charles C. Butler, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

This is an action by defendant in error, Gilmore, to recover for professional services rendered and expenditures made, as an .attorney-at-law, for plaintiff in error, Scott. Two separate counts were j oined, the first upon an account stated, and the other on quantum meruit. Each count was. for a like amount, and for the same service and expenditure. Verdict was for plaintiff, recovery being fixed in the sum of $1,381.45 on each count. ' Judgment, however, was entered for $1,381.45 only. It is that judgment which is here for review.

It is unnecessary to discuss- all the errors assigned in order…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kronenberger v. BinzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  2. St. Louis Lager Beer Bottling Co. v. Colorado National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  3. Boyd v. MunsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stone Ex Rel. Estate of Webster v. WebsterIdaho Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API