Legal Opinion

In re Wyoming Tight Sands Antitrust Cases

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided September 21, 1989No. Civ. A. Nos. 85-2349-S, 85-2364-S, 85-2438-S, 85-2511-S, 85-2605-S and 86-2351-SPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAFFELS, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the motions of plaintiff Kansas Power and Light (“KPL”) and plaintiff Kansas Gas and Electric for an order dismissing certain claims which they have asserted without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The court agrees with defendants that the more appropriate manner of dropping certain claims is by amending the complaint pursuant to Rule 15. Rule 41(a)(2) concerns voluntary dismissal of the entire action, not the dismissal of certain claims. See Smith, Kline & French Labs…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith, Kline & French Laboratories v. A. H. Robins Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gobbo Farms & Orchards, a Colorado Partnership v. Poole Chemical Company, Inc., a Texas Corporation Authorized to Do Business in the State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  2. Van Leeuwen v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, D. Utah · 2015
  3. Campbell v. HoffmanDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
  4. Environmental Dynamics, Inc. v. Robert Tyer & Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
  5. Pedroza v. Lomas Auto Mall, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API