Metropolitan Ice Co. v. Ducas
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a final decree entered on March 12, 1935, enjoining the defendant from engaging directly or indirectly in the ice business within the cities of Cambridge and Somerville, for the period of eighteen months from the date of the entry of the decree. The testimony is reported under Rule 76 of the Superior Court (1932) without findings of fact.
The defendant and one Booas until 1926 conducted an ice business in Somerville and Cambridge in this Commonwealth, under the name “Daylight Ice Company.” In 1926 they entered into an agreement with the plaintiff, under…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sherman v. PfefferkornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Economy Grocery Stores Corp. v. McMenamyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Edgecomb v. EdmonstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Anchor Electric Co. v. HawkesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Becker College of Business Administration & Secretarial Science v. GrossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- John Roane, Inc. v. TweedSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Novelty Bias Binding Co. v. ShevrinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Ehlers v. Iowa Warehouse CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- Fullerton Lumber Co. v. TorborgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.