All Brand Importers, Inc. v. Tampa Crown Distributors, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
This is a breach of contract action, the outcome of which partially turns on whether the district court properly held that the statute of frauds bars the enforcement of an alleged oral contract for the sole distributorship of the beer products of plaintiff.
We hold that the Florida Statute of Frauds, Fla.Stat. § 725.01, bars enforcement of an oral contract that was intended by the parties to last longer than a year, even though the contract could have been terminated for cause within a year. Khawly v. Reboul, 488 So.2d 856 (Fla.3d D.C.A.1986).
With this holding, we affirm the judgment of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Everett v. NapperCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Khawly v. ReboulDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Osteen v. MorrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- First Realty Inv. Corp. v. GallaherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Anthony Distributors, Inc. v. Miller Brewing Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
- Hesston Corp. v. RocheDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Hospital Corp. v. ASSOC. IN ADOL. PSYCHIATRYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Melissa C. Butterworth v. Laboratory Corporation of America HoldingsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Topp, Inc. v. Uniden American Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.