Legal Opinion

Nash v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 12, 1954No. 35178PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

Code § 13-2039, providing in substance that, when a bank deposit is made payable to either of two named persons or the survivor, such deposit may be paid to either of said persons whether the other is living or not, and the receipt of the person so paid shall be a valid and sufficient release and discharge to the bank for the payment made, has reference only to the liability of the bank as to such deposit, and does not affect the right to the property as between the parties. Clark v. Bridges, 163 Ga. 542, 546 (136 S. E. 444).

Where a deposit is made to an account of two persons which is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Equitable Loan & Security Co. v. WaringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Clark v. BridgesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  3. Compton v. HendricksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  4. First National Bank v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Lowe v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commercial Banking Co. v. SpurlockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Witzel v. WitzelWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Sams v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. Spurlock v. Commercial Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Quinn v. ForsythCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API