Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Perez

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 2008Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

I respectfully dissent. The majority holds that the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County (trial court) properly denied the motion for the return of property filed by Francisco Perez (Perez) without holding a hearing to determine whether the trial court lacked jurisdiction to grant the forfeiture of property seized in Philadelphia. For the following reasons, I cannot agree.

Police in the city of Reading, Berks County, obtained a warrant for the arrest of Perez in connection with a shooting. The police learned that Perez would be at a location in Philadelphia…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BetheaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. In Re Administrative Order No. 1-Md-2003Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Flynn v. Casa Di Bertacchi Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Barnes v. McKellarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. M & P Management, L.P. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API