Legal Opinion

Compton v. Hastings

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 9, 1987No. 84-2754-J-2; CA A40152PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiff brought this action to recover for work done on defendants’ property, alleging alternative claims based on contract, account stated and quantum meruit. After a jury trial, plaintiff was awarded judgment on the quantum meruit claim, plus interest at the statutory rate from the date the work was completed. Defendants appeal, and we affirm.

Defendants’ first three assignments of error concern the contract claim. Any error of potential prejudice to defendants on that claim was cured by the jury’s verdict for plaintiff on the quantum meruit claim. See Horn v. City of Elgin, 28 Or App 545,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Portland Ex Rel. Donohue & Fleskes Corp. v. Hoffman Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hazelwood Water District v. First Union Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Horn v. City of ElginCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. QHG of Lake City, Inc. v. McCutcheonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API