Legal Opinion

Button v. Traders Trust Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1930No. 22407. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This was an action of interpleader and for specific performance of a real estate contract. At the time the action was begun, the plaintiff paid into court approximately the sum of $1,000, which was the balance due on the contract. The defendants G-eorge M. Hellar and wife claimed this money, as did also the other defendant, Edith MacFarlane. The canse was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which the court concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to a specific performance of the contract and that Mrs. MacFarlane was entitled to the money. From the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Livieratos v. Commonwealth Security Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Parker v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Flyge v. FlynnNevada Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Meltzer v. Wendell-WestCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  3. Seattle Ass'n of Credit Men v. Bank of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Biehn v. LyonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Connecticut Car Rental, Inc. v. Prime One Capital Co., LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API