Legal Opinion
Cox v. True North Energy, LLC.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided November 20, 2007No. 1:07-cv-1372PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
DAN AARON POLSTER, District Judge.
Before the Court are two Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendant True North Energy, LLC, (“True North”) that, when combined, seek dismissal of all of Plaintiff Nancy Cox’s claims. (ECF Nos. 6 (Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint) and 12 (Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint) (collectively “the Rule 12(b)(6) Motions,” “the Motions,” or “the Motions to Dismiss”).) For the reasons that follow, True North’s Motions are GRANTED IN PART, AND DENIED IN PART.
I. BACKGROUND
The…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ghawanmeh v. Islamic Saudi AcademyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Smith v. GradyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Hollabaugh v. Office of the Architect of the CapitolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Badri v. Huron HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- Ghawanmeh v. Islamic Saudi AcademyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.