Legal Opinion

Brubaker v. Brookshire Municipal Water District

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 7, 1991No. C14-90-693-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERTSON, Justice.

This appeal is from a summary judgment granted in favor of appellees, defendants in the trial court, on appellants’ causes of action arising out of appellees failure to provide water and sewer services to an apartment project. Appellants present three points of error contesting the propriety of the summary judgment. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Appellants, Dan Brubaker, Donna Bru-baker, Clyde Brubaker and Maudine Bru-baker, alleged in their third amended petition that in 1979, the defendant Brookshire Municipal Water District (District), pursuant to a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Corrections v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Clear Lake City Water Authority v. Clear Lake Utilities Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Bennett v. Brown County Water Improvement District No. OneTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Campbell v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Willacy County Water Control & Improvement District No. 1 v. AbendrothTexas Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hidden Oaks Limited, Hidden Oaks Limited, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. The City of Austin, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. Loyd v. ECO Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  3. City of Arlington v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Garza v. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
  5. McMillan v. Northwest Harris County Municipal Utility District No. 24, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API