Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Pike

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 28, 1931No. A-7967PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus. Petitioner alleges that he is unlawfully restrained by the warden of the penitentiary at McAlester; that, with others, in the district court of Craig county, he was charged with conjoint robbery alleged to have been committed July 19, 1923; that he was convicted, and in November, 1923, he was sentenced to serve a term of 15 years; that at the date of the crime a|lleged, the punishment fixed by law (chapter 85, Sess. Laws 1923) was a minimum of 25 years; that, a sentence of 15 years being contrary to law, the restraint of petitioner is illegal.

It…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HollingsheadCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Ex Parte DunnCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Ex Parte LydeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Ex Parte BarnetteCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Cornett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ruffing v. JamesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Oswald v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Ex Parte FaberCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Ex Parte BaileyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Newton v. KeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API