Legal Opinion

Hinsch v. Mothorn

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1927No. 4584PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

Plaintiff and defendants entered into an agreement in writing for the purchase by defendants from plaintiff of a certain tract of land. The agreement contains a reference to a previous contract between defendants and plaintiff’s assignors for the sale of the same land, and after stating that an indebtedness of $4,500 remained thereon and that it was the “desire of the parties to reduce the said indebtedness to $4,000,” the agreement recites:

“Now, therefore, it is understood and agreed, That the parties of the second part (defendants) shall pay Five Hundred ($500.00) Dollars to said Albert…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland Cattle Loan Co. v. Hansen Livestock & Feeding Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Edwards v. MuriMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Hall v. YaryanIdaho Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Mulcahy v. GagliardoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Howard v. Bar Bell Land & Cattle Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Davies v. BoydNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Ellis v. ButterfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Molyneux v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Williams v. HavensIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API