Legal Opinion

Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. v. Brian Laine and Kimberly Laine

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided December 29, 2020No. 14-18-00216-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Motion for Rehearing Granted in Part; Motion for En Banc Reconsideration Denied as Moot; Memorandum Opinion of June 18, 2020, Withdrawn; Reversed in Part, Affirmed in Part, and Substitute Majority Opinion and Concurring and Dissenting Opinion filed December 29, 2020. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-00216-CV JOE ALFRED IZEN, JR., Appellant V. BRIAN LAINE AND KIMBERLY LAINE, Appellees On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-28211 SUBSTITUTE MAJORITY OPINION ON REHEARING We grant in part appellant’s motion for rehearing. We withdraw our…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Joe v. Two Thirty Nine Joint VentureTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. S.V. v. R.V.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Burrow v. ArceTexas Supreme Court · 1999

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API