Ingraham v. England
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtVaughan, J.
This case is improperly styled in this court. Ingraham did not appeal. The intervener, Oak Cliff Planing Mill & Manufacturing Company, alone appealed. The style of the case in the trial court was “W. H. England and wife v. Elmer O. Ingra-ham. -Appellant, intervener in the court below, appeals from the judgment, so that the style of the case in this court should be Oak Cliff Planing Mill & Manufacturing Company, Appellant, v. W. H. England et ux., Appellees. Errors of this character are not infrequent, and are due to clerks of triál courts failing to properly style cases in preparing them for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Murphy v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1910
- Mayers v. McRimmon.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Smalley v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1871
- Ragland v. WisrockTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Ratliff v. TinerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ellington v. Commercial State Bank of San AugustineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- American Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HeckermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- First State Bank of Three Rivers v. PetruchaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Langlois v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Bynum v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.