Clinton Thiel Stephens v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
The appellant was tried and convicted of violating the mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1341. ' He seeks a reversal because: (1) his motion for a judgment of acquittal made at the conclusion of the Government’s case was not granted; and (2) an alleged fatal variance between the evidence and the charge contained in the indictment.
When the motion for acquittal was made, the trial judge reserved his ruling until the conclusion of the evidence. The motion was not renewed and there was no ruling on it. In these circumstances we must consider the state of the evidence when the motion was made. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- William Dennis Riggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Steiner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Alton T. Milam, Burr F. Sprague and Robert B. Kimball v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Corbett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- William Webster Weaver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Frederick Newell Boswell, David Rule Nichols and Emmett Howard HerndonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. J. Marshall BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- William J. Sanders and Joseph Russell Buschkotter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. KohlmannCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.