Legal Opinion
M. Sobel, Inc. v. Weinstein (In Re Weinstein)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 17, 1999No. 8-19-70968PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE DISTRICT COURT TO WITHDRAW THE REFERENCE WITH RESPECT TO AN ADVERSARY PROCEEDING IN WHICH THE PLAINTIFF MADE A TIMELY AND PROPER DEMAND FOR A JURY TRIAL
STAN B. BERNSTEIN, Bankruptcy Judge.
Issue
On October 15, 1998, the plaintiff, M. Sobel, Inc. (plaintiff), filed an amended complaint for a determination of nondis- chargeability 1 under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) and (2)(B) 2 against the debtor-defendant, Marshall Weinstein (debtor or defendant), for a debt incurred as a result of fraud. The plaintiff made a timely demand for a jury trial and moved to withdraw the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Liquidation Trust of Hechinger Investment Co. of Delaware, Inc. v. Fleet Retail Finance Group (In Re Hechinger Investment Co.)District Court, D. Delaware · 2005
- Scheidelman v. Henderson (In Re Henderson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 2010
- McCord v. PapantoniouDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- M C Contractors, Inc. v. Fink (Fink)District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2003
- Gradco Corp v. Blankenship (In Re Blankenship)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.