Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Marriage of Lehman

California Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1998No. S062850Published

1DissentBaxter, J.

I respectfully dissent. A marital community has a contractual entitlement to all benefits earned by a spouse during the marriage under *189terms and conditions of employment then in effect. In my view, however, a dissolved community has no stake, by contract or otherwise, in any “enhancement” of benefits that was first offered after the marital separation and was not in effect during the marriage. This should particularly be the rule when the enhanced benefits are a new employer “subsidy” provided for the purpose of inducing a voluntary termination of employment, the future earnings and pension…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In Re Marriage of FithianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Betts v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. French v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API