Legal Opinion
Smiley v. Daimler Chrysler
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 21, 2008No. Civil Action 07-05-SLRPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff David A. Smiley (“plaintiff’), who proceeds pro se and has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, filed this action against Daimler Chrysler (“defendant”) alleging employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5. Now before the court are plaintiffs motions to amend the complaint and defendant’s oppositions thereto. (D.I.ll, 12, 17, 18) For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant in part and deny in part the motions.
II. BACKGROUND
T…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Stanford Shane Otis Terrell Robert Stewart v. William Fauver, Commissioner James Barbo, Administrator Rogers, Chief Director of CustodyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Miller v. Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc. (In Re American Business Financial Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2011
- Kuhn Construction Co. v. Ocean & Coastal Consultants, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Daoud v. City of WilmingtonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Esaka v. NANTICOKE HEALTH SERVICES, INC.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- BROWN v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.