Zylanz v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtSharer, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether appellant, Tavony Wayne Zylanz, knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to trial by jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County. 1 He posits that his jury trial waiver was “constitutionally flawed because the record does not demonstrate that it was knowing ly and voluntarily made and because the trial court failed to make any findings on the record that the waiver was constitutionally effective.” We shall hold that the waiver was knowingly and voluntarily made, and affirm.
Substantive and procedural law regarding a defendant’s waiver of trial by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Tibbs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Powell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Christian v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Powell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006