Legal Opinion

Homier v. Faricy Truck & Equipment Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 24, 1989No. 87CA1513PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge JONES.

In this contract action, plaintiffs (collectively Homier) appeal judgments entered against them after a trial to the court on their claims against defendant, Faricy Truck and Equipment Company (Faricy), and on defendant’s counterclaims for deficiency. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Homier and Faricy entered into a written agreement whereby Homier, designated as purchaser, would purchase from Faricy, designated as seller, a truck with a 15-foot dump body. The dump body was to be manufactured and mounted by Cal Pro Group, which was owned by one Caler.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pepcol Manufacturing Co. v. Denver Union Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. I.M.A., Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. Radke v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. Rexite Casting Co. v. Midwest Mower Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. L.U. Cattle Co. v. WilsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re: United Air Lines, Inc., Debtor. United Air Lines, Inc. v. Hsbc Bank USA as Paying Agent, and City and County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Univex International, Inc. v. Orix Credit Alliance, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. United Airlines Inc v. HSBC Bank USACourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  4. Univex International, Inc. v. Orix Credit Alliance, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  5. Univex International, Inc. v. Orix Credit Alliance, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API