Legal Opinion

Birdsong v. Nurture, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 28, 2017No. 16-CV-4435 (RRM) (PK)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, United States District Judge.

Defendant Nurture, Inc. (“Nurture”) sells infant and baby food products that are marketed, labeled, and sold as “Organic.” Sarah Birdsong, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, brings this putative class action against Nurture, alleging that Nurture misled consumers about the ingredients of its Happy Family brand products (the “Products”). Specifically, Birdsong alleges that the packaging for these products contains the representation “Organic” when in fact the Products contain ingredients that the United…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Harris v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  4. Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Organic Consumers Ass'n v. Hain Celestial Grp., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API