Birdsong v. Nurture, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, United States District Judge.
Defendant Nurture, Inc. (“Nurture”) sells infant and baby food products that are marketed, labeled, and sold as “Organic.” Sarah Birdsong, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, brings this putative class action against Nurture, alleging that Nurture misled consumers about the ingredients of its Happy Family brand products (the “Products”). Specifically, Birdsong alleges that the packaging for these products contains the representation “Organic” when in fact the Products contain ingredients that the United…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harris v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Organic Consumers Ass'n v. Hain Celestial Grp., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018