Legal Opinion

United States v. Dante G. Frazier

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 22, 2005No. 04-1005PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAM, Circuit Judge.

On July 25, 2003, a jury convicted Appellant Dante Frazier of knowingly or intentionally possessing pseudoephedrine with the knowledge or reasonable belief that the pseudoephedrine would be used in the manufacture of methámphetamine. Frazier appeals, arguing that 1) the district court 1 improperly denied his motion to suppress the evidence; 2) the' government’s use of postarrest, pre-Miranda silence violated his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination; 3) the district court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal; and 4) the district court erred in…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  3. State v. DeGraffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API