Commonwealth v. Bodge
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Judge:
After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of eleven charges arising out of an armed robbery. Post-verdict motions were denied, and appellant was sentenced. Because of our disposition, this case must be remanded for further proceedings.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, as verdict winner, the following was ad*379duced at trial. On June 6, 1975, two individuals entered the home of Mr. Joseph Criville and attempted to force him to open a wall-safe in his basement. Ultimately, Mrs. Criville opened the safe, and the robbers escaped with $21,000. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981