Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Thomas

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 13, 1981No. 554Published

1DissentPrice, Judge

This appeal involves the appellant’s contention that the suppression court erred in admitting a statement made by appellant following a warning pursuant to Section 10-110 of the Philadelphia Home Rule Charter. I agree and respectfully dissent. On the basis of the improper admission of appellant’s statement I would vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial.

Although the majority essentially recaps the facts, I repeat them here, with some enlargement in pertinent regards. At or about 6:30 p. m. on July 5, 1977, appellant’s sister, Marva Crafton, was assaulted in the vicinity of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Gardner v. BroderickSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API