Legal Opinion · Dissent

Peel v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of Illinois

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 4, 1990No. 88-1775Published

1DissentJustice O’Connor

This case provides yet another example of the difficulties raised by rote application of the commercial speech doctrine in the context of state regulation of professional standards for attorneys. Nothing in our prior cases in this area mandates that we strike down the state regulation at issue here, which is designed to ensure a reliable and ethical profession. Failure to accord States considerable latitude in this area embroils this Court in the micromanagement of the State’s inherent authority to police the ethical standards of the profession within its borders.

Petitioner argues for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. In re R. M. J.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Friedman v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Cardinale v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API