Legal Opinion

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. E. F. Hutton & Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided November 10, 1975No. Civ. A. 5-71746PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

PHILIP PRATT, District Judge.

This action was instituted by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (“Merrill Lynch”), a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New York, against four former account executives 1 2 (“individual defendants”), who are Michigan residents, and E. F. Hutton & Company, Inc. (“Hutton”), a Delaware corporation with principal place of business in New York, seeking temporary and permanent injunctive relief, as well as damages, for alleged violation of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. A.L.K. Corporation v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  2. Foundry Services, Inc. v. Beneflux CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  3. Charles C. Allison v. Robert C. Froehlke, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  4. New England Overall Co. Inc. v. WoltmannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  5. Tele-Controls, Inc. And Audio Systems Co. v. Ford Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pennwalt Corp. v. Zenith Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
  2. Thermatool Corp. v. BorzymMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Fox v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995
  4. Schalk v. Teledyne, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1990
  5. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. HagertyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API