Legal Opinion
United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Telesfor (Ted) Romero v. Douglas Construction Co., Inc., a Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 3, 1976No. 75--1168PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
The issue here presented concerns the applicability of certain provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act to low-rent housing projects built in New Mexico by the Douglas Construction Co. for the All Indian Pueblo Housing Authority. The All Indian Pueblo Housing Authority, hereinafter referred to as All Indian, contracted with Douglas for the construction of two low-rent housing projects. Douglas’ surety on both projects was United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company. Clovis O. Herrera Corporation was the plumbing subcontractor on both projects and its surety was American…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States for the Benefit of KenyonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Barnard-Curtiss Company and the Seaboard Surety Company, Surety v. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of D. W. Falls Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States ex rel. General Rock & Sand Corp. v. Chuska Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Battle v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- United States ex rel. Petrofsky v. Van Cott, Bagley, Cornwall, McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- District of Columbia v. Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- The United States For The Use And Benefit Of General Rock & Sand Corporation v. Chuska Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.