Legal Opinion

Lai Ling Cheng v. Modansky Leasing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 11, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs’ successor attorneys, Sullivan & Liapakis, P.C., appeal on the ground of excessiveness, and the plaintiffs’ prior attorney, Edward Murtaugh, cross-appeals on the ground of inadequacy, from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Rosenblatt, J.), dated July 15, 1986, which, after a hearing, awarded Murtaugh, the attorney who represented the plaintiffs in this matter prior to the commencement of the lawsuit, the principal sum of $108,000, representing 20% of the total attorney’s fee in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lai Ling Cheng v. Modansky Leasing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Cheng v. Modansky Leasing, Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. In re the Estate of HallgartenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. GoverneleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Pearl v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Hinds v. KilgallenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Kutner v. AntonacciNew York District Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API