Legal Opinion

Kutner v. Antonacci

New York District Court

Decided May 25, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

*586OPINION OF THE COURT

Gary F. Knobel, J.

The issue presented by the plaintiff for determination has not been specifically addressed by the Code of Professional Responsibility, and appears to have only been ruled upon by a New York court in an advisory opinion issued on October 5, 2006 by the Appellate Division, First Department, in Ween v Dow (35 AD3d 58 [2006]): may an attorney recover interest at the rate set forth in the client’s retainer agreement for monies owed by the client, even if the client (or the guarantor) never objects to the particular interest rate provided for in that retainer…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of PottsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  2. Lai Ling Cheng v. Modansky Leasing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Jacobson v. SassowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Campagnola v. MulhollandNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Matter of CoopermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API