Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Territory of Oklahoma

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 6, 1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the District Court of Comanche County; before Frank E. GilletteJ Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burwell, J.:

The defendant, F. F. Fisher, was indicted with Dick Coleman and Herman Bertram for the crime of larceny from the person.

It is the theory of the prosecution that there was a conspiracy between these defendants and one Maud Jarvis, a common prostitute at the time, to steal money from the person of one G. L. Reiser, and that pursuant to such conspiracy Reiser was gotten drunk, and that Maud Jarvis took the money from him, in a wine room in a saloon in the< city of Lawton. Fisher was tried separately from the other defendants. The jury found him guilty and he…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BunyardOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Stevenson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API