Flowers & Sons Development Corp. v. Municipal Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WHITE, P. J.
Defendants and appellants Flowers and Sons Development Corporation, Jannan Construction, Inc., Stan Flowers and Stan Flowers Company, Inc., appeal from the judgment dismissing their petition for writ of prohibition. They contend on appeal that (1) their petition for writ of prohibition was not prematurely filed; and (2) the municipal court lacked jurisdiction over respondent’s amended com plaint. Appellants’ contentions were meritorious, that is, until the parties in effect stipulated that the Edgewater property was sold. We will explain that this fact revested the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Vella v. HudginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Stearns v. Los Angeles City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Thomasian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. BozekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Thompson v. HansonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Richman v. LeiserMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Deyong Management, Ltd. v. PrevisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. KeenanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.