Legal Opinion

George O. Richardson Machinery Co. v. Swartzel

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 11, 1905No. 13,945PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Sumner district court; Carroll A. Swarts, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*774The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J. :

By this action J. R. Swartzel seeks to recover from the George 0. Richardson Machinery Company the value of his services in the sale of a thrashing rig. He entered into a contract with the company by which he was to sell thrashing rigs at Caldwell and receive as compensation twenty per cent, of the selling-prices. On cash sales his commissions were to be paid out of the cash received, and on credit sales, where notes were to be taken, he was to be paid from the proceeds of the notes when each note should be paid in full. In the latter…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Fitzgerald v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  3. Derby v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1848
  4. Mooney v. York Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Jenson v. LeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Levin v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Central Lumber Co. v. Arkansas Valley Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. J. I. Case Co. v. BodeckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API