Jenson v. Lee
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Morris district court; O. L. Moore, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J. :
The petition in this case was in the form of a common count for the recovery of the reasonable value of work and labor performed. It was not attacked by motion or otherwise, and the answer was a general denial. The plaintiff’s evidence, if true, established the fact that he had engaged to work on a farm and stock ranch owned, equipped, stocked and managed by defendant; that his compensation was to be one-third of the profits to be derived from the farm and the sale of stock; that his duties embraced all classes of services incident to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Fitzgerald v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Derby v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1848
- McCullough v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
- Meagher v. MorganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1865
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Company v. United States of America for the Use of H. C. Jones, Doing Business as H. C. Jones Construction Company, Burden Ivy Barfield, Bourdon Ray Barfield, and Oliver Eakle Barfield, as Co-Partners Doing Business as Barfield Construction Company v. United States of America for the Use of H. C. Jones, Doing Business as H. C. Jones Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Brashear v. RabensteinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. v. United States ex rel. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Underwood v. VilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Southern Painting Company Of Tennessee, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.