Ritchie v. Turner
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
KELLER, J., CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART:
I concur with the majority opinion's holding that there can be both ministerial and discretionary components to the duty to report. However, I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion's analysis and conclusion that the school officials' duties in this case were discretionary. I believe the majority overlooks important precedent in immunity law and erroneously relies on cases that are clearly distinguishable. I also hold that the majority has too broadly expanded our immunity law.
IMMUNITY: MINISTERIAL V. DISCRETIONARY
The school…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Yanero v. DavisKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
- Pathways, Inc. v. HammonsKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Rowan County v. SloasKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- Mullins v. Commonwealth Life Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992
- Osborne v. KeeneyKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.