Legal Opinion
Vanegas v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 23, 2001PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendant Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company is obligated to defend and indemnify its insureds, Audrey Brevard and Elnora Brevard, in a personal injury action entitled Vane-gas v Town of Hempstead, pending in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated May 18, 2000, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment declaring that it is not obligated to defend and indemnify its insureds in the underlying action.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- General Accident Insurance Group v. CirucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- QDR Consultants & Development Corp. v. Colonia InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Eagle Insurance v. OrtegaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- United States Liability Insurance v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. GathAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gorman v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Vacca v. State Farm InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Abreu v. HuangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JosephAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Hereford Insurance v. MohammodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.