Legal Opinion

Eagle Insurance v. Ortega

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 1, 1998PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is not obligated to defend, indemnify, or reimburse its insureds, the defendants Maria E. Ortega and Victor Ortega, in an underlying negligence action brought by the defendant Balla Keita, the defendant Balla Keita appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), dated July 22, 1996, as denied that branch of his motion which was, in effect, for summary judgment declaring that the plaintiff was obligated to defend and indemnify its insureds in the underlying action, and granted the plaintiffs cross…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. General Accident Insurance Group v. CirucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. United States Liability Insurance v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mount Vernon Fire Insurance v. HarrisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
  2. Vacca v. State Farm InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JosephAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Utica Mutual Insurance v. GathAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Hazen v. Otsego Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API