Legal Opinion · Dissent
Mabon v. Myers
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 8, 2001No. SC S48518Published
1DissentDurham, J.
I dissent from the majority’s decision to require the Attorney General to modify the caption of the ballot title certified by the Attorney General.
Two errors of law undermine the majority’s conclusion. The first concerns the majority’s failure to comply with ORS 250.085(6), which provides:
“When reviewing a title prepared by the Attorney General, the court shall not consider arguments concerning the ballot title not presented in writing to the Secretary of State unless the court determines that the argument concerns language added to or removed from the draft title after expiration of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Coast Security Mortgage Corp. v. Real Estate AgencyOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- COST SECURITY v. Real Estate AgencyOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Greene v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.