Nero v. Material Sales Co., Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from denial of a Rule 60 (b) motion. We affirm.
The pleading, without legend but which the trial court considered as a Rule 60 (b) motion, alleged that a judgment entered against defendant upon agreement and consent of his retained counsel was without the knowledge, consent and authority of defendant. It further alleged that defendant had a meritorious defense to the suit. The defendant and original plaintiff denied the allegations. Evidence was heard by the court and the court refused to set aside the judgment.
The clerk's record discloses the following: Sam Nero was sued by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex parte HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Senn v. JosephSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Wadsworth v. First National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Martin v. HowardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mitchum v. HudgensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- American Auto. Ins. Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Daniel v. ScottCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Chavis v. ChavisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Beverly v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.