Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Souther
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 30, 1964No. 40703Published
1Opinion of the Court
110 Ga. App. 84 (1964)
137 S.E.2d 705
HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY et al.
v.
SOUTHER et al.
40703.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Decided June 30, 1964.
Rehearing Denied July 15, 1964.
Woodruff, Savell, Lane & Williams, John M. Williams, for plaintiff in error.
William V. George, contra.
PANNELL, Judge.
1. "There is no requirement in our [Workmen's Compensation] law that the employee at the time of the injury must have no objective other than the service of the employer." Travelers Ins. Co. v. Bailey, 76 Ga. App. 698 (2) (47 SE2d 103); U. S. Fidelity &c. Co. v. Croft, 93 Ga. App. 114 (3) (91 SE2d…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shoffler v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Smith v. University of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. FarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. SockwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.