Legal Opinion

Chicago & Erie Railroad v. Schenkel

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1914No. 8,092PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From Wabash. Circuit Court; Francis F. Brown, Special Judge. Action by Edward Schenkel against the Chicago and Erie Bailroad Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFelt, J.

Appellee recovered judgment against appellant for personal injuries. On appeal from this judgment the errors assigned and duly presented by the briefs call in question the action of the court in overruling the demurrer to the first paragraph of appellee’s amended complaint and also to the fourth paragraph of amended complaint; overruling appellant’s motion for judgment on the answers of the jury to the interrogatories, for a new trial and in arrest of judgment.

1. Omitting the formal averments, and details about which there is no controversy, the gist of the first paragraph of amended…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Consolidated Stone Co. v. SummitIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. McCoy v. Kokomo Railway & Light Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Jenney Electric Manufacturing Co. v. FlanneryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Wabash Railroad v. McNownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. GrossIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Lavene v. FriedrichsIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Williams v. LoweIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Modern Woodmen of America v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Marietta Glass Manufacturing Co. v. BennettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API