Legal Opinion
Stratek Plastic Ltd. v. Ibar
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 3, 2013No. AC 34458PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
In this fraudulent conveyance action, the defendant Jean-Pierre Ibar (Ibar)1 appeals from the *416judgment of the trial court, rendered following a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, Stratek Plastic Limited (Stratek). On appeal, Ibar claims that the court improperly charged the jury regarding the standard of proof that is required in a fraudulent conveyance action and informed the jury that it had directed a verdict in favor of Stratek in a companion case. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals the following facts and procedural history. Stratek brought this…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- West Haven Sound Development Corp. v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. CoopermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Kosko v. KohlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Baldwin v. JableckiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Ibar v. Stratek Plastic Ltd.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Martin v. OlsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
- Champeau v. BlitzerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- Sola v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- State v. BardalesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016