Legal Opinion

Estate of Haberli

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1968No. 55PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The following issues are raised on this appeal:(1) Was the testamentary gift a specific or a demonstrative legacy;(2) If a specific legacy was created, was it adeemed by extinction; and(3) Was the testatrix’s intention to have all of the children share equally in the estate?

Type of Testamentary Gift.

The testamentary gift to Laura Naumann can only be a specific legacy.

“A specific legacy may be defined as a bequest of a particular, individualized chattel, fund, or portion of the testator’s personal estate, which is set apart from the balance of his property and which is differentiated from all…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Bierstedt's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  2. Cudahy v. CudahyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Atkinson v. AtkinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Will of Hinners v. HinnersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Will of Blomdahl v. ErlandsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boerner v. BoernerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In Re Estate of LarsellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API