Legal Opinion
City of Moses Lake v. United States
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided December 30, 2005No. CV-04-0376-AAMPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
MCDONALD, Senior District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT are plaintiffs Motion To Amend Complaint (Ct.Rec.141) and Motion For Preliminary Injunction (Ct.Rec.150). These motions were heard with oral argument on December 22, 2005. Steven G. Jones, Esq., argued on behalf of plaintiff City of Moses Lake (“Moses Lake”), Mary Anne Zivnuska, Esq., and Michael J. Zevenbergen, Esq., argued on behalf of the United States.
I. BACKGROUND
Moses Lake brought this action against Lockheed Martin Corporation, Boeing Company, and the United States…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Burton v. City of Belle GladeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State of New York v. Next Millenium RealtyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- City of Fresno v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Sierra Club v. JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Pakootas v. Teck Cominco MetalsDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2022
- State of New York v. Next Millenium RealtyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013